Skip to main content
Home
  • Agile
  • Manage
  • Test
Register
Log In
  • Home
    • TechWell.com
  • My Page
  • Communities
    • Agile
    • Manage
    • Test
  • Interact
    • Blogs
    • Forums
  • Resources
    • Articles
    • Better Software
    • Download Center
    • News Center
    • Podcasts
  • Events
    • Web Seminars
    • Conferences
    • Training
  • Jobs
  • Membership
  • Feedback
  • Contact Us

Economics, Models, and Money

Blog Post

Economics, Models, and Money

Blog Post by Johanna Rothman | Comments: (0) | Thu, 10/13/2011 - 8:23am
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Print

Israel Gat had a great Agile Cutter Advisor recently, the Friction of Agile (registration required). He discussed the friction of agile going up in geographically distributed teams because of the dis-economies of assimilation (the space-time continuum problem, and the issue of under-funding the infrastructure of the non US-based teams). He had a stunning (to me) quote from a manager, when he explained what moving to agile would cost:

“Such investment will break our economical model.”

Wage cost is not the same as project cost. And, if you don’t outfit the “remote” team with the necessary infrastructure as the “headquarters” team, you can save a bundle. (Do you hear my sarcasm?) Of course, you pay for it in the cost of communication, the cost to ask a question, the overall schedule delays, and project cost. And, if the remote team are the testers and the headquarters team are the developers, well, guess what? You’ve got second class testers.

Types of Teams

Types of Teams

In agile, we can’t afford second class testers (or second class remote teams), because the delay in acquiring information during the iteration is too high a risk. That’s Israel’s Friction of Agile bumping against the economies of scale.

If you look at the types of teams in this figure, you can see that everything above the middle line, the co-located and distributed cross-functional teams, have a shot of working well in agile, assuming they have adequate tools. Silo’d teams, and the dispersed teams have built in delays because they are not already cross-functional. Can you make them work? You can make anything work. Will they have communication delays? Yes.

But, as soon as you remove adequate tools from distributed teams, all bets are off.

If your economic model for distributed development is this: “Don’t pay people and don’t pay for their infrastructure,” I have a reply. “You can ‘save’ all you want on wages and infrastructure. You will pay for it in defects, technical debt, unhappy customers and eventual product death. Is that what you want?”

Infrastructure is inexpensive these days. I don’t understand why you would technologically handicap a team.

  • Project & Team Management
About The Author: Johanna Rothman

Johanna Rothman is a management consultant and a regular StickyMinds.com and Better Software magazine columnist. Johanna is the author of the recently published Manage Your Project Portfolio: Increase Your Capacity and Finish More Projects, Manage It! Your Guide to Modern, Pragmatic Project Management--winner of the 2008 Jolt Productivity Award, as well as the coauthor of Behind Closed Doors and author of Hiring the Best Knowledge Workers, Techies & Nerds. She is a host of the Amplifying Your Effectiveness Conference. Johanna has presented at STAREAST, STARWEST, the Better Software Conference & EXPO, and Applications of Software Measurement & Management conferences. You can reach her at jr@jrothman.com or by visiting www.jrothman.com.

View More

More like this

  • Better Software & Agile Development Conference West
  • Show Me the Money
  • Information Gathering
  • All Models are Wrong
  • Keeping Secrets

Welcome to TechWell!

With an ever-expanding library of content by industry experts, TechWell is your source for software knowledge. The site is still growing, so please pardon our dust. If you see anything that requires our attention, please CONTACT us.

Not a member? REGISTER to join our community.
Already a member? Log In

Hot Topics

  • Most Read
  • Most Discussed
  • Most Shared
  • New Downloads

Matt Heusser and Company Discuss "Testing is Dead"

Blog Post by Jonathan Vanian
 Do you think testing is dead? Matt Heusser recently put up a great podcast over at Software Test Professionals discussing this blasphemous topic. Read More

Management Myth #1: The Myth of 100% Utilization

Article by Johanna Rothman | Comments (17)
 A manager took me aside at a recent engagement. “You know, Johanna, there’s something I just don’t understand about this agile thing. It sure doesn’t look like everyone is being used at 100 percent... Read More

Edit Those Epics

Article by Johanna Rothman | Comments (23)
 I've been working with folks making their transition to agile. One of the hardest transitions is for the managers and technical leaders.Managers are accustomed to working in timeboxes. To them, the... Read More

Passing the Baton

Article by Rinku Sahay | Comments (2)
 I was watching a relay race recently. A relay is where members of a team take turns to perform and complete a certain action or activity. In a relay race, one team member passes a baton to another... Read More

Three Components of Effective Defect-management Systems

Article by Krishen Kota | Comments (3)
 From a high-level view, defect management systems are made up of a combination of some defect management tools or tool and a defect management process. These two primary components work together to... Read More

The Optimists Don't Make It Out

Blog Post by Lee Copeland | Comments (2)
 There’s only one advantage to delayed flights, missed connec­tions, and extra nights stuck in hotels far away from home—you can catch up on your reading. The book at the top of my “to read” list was... Read More

Considering the Modern Technology Career

Article by Matthew Heusser
 Software development is a young field, at least compared with established professions like law and medicine. The choice to work in software is likewise a different choice. It is often made in youth... Read More

Testing Tradeoffs and Project Risk: A Case Study

Article by Payson Hall
 The project had issues. It was a two-year project intended to swap an aging legacy application for a commercial product. The vendor’s off-the-shelf software required some customization and extension... Read More

The ROI of Learning for Testers

Article by Lisa Crispin
  During my software career, I’ve spent a lot of time and effort learning new thinking and technical skills. I’ve encouraged my peers to do the same. The series that Janet Gregory and I wrote on... Read More

The Top 5 Frustrations for Project Managers

See how you can avoid management swoop-in at the eleventh hour, or creating and sending around a dreaded 200-page plan that no one has time to read once, let alone every time a change occurs. We've... Read More - Get this content

Follow Us On...

Follow us on Twitter
Twitter
Follow us on Facebook
Facebook
Follow us on LinkedIn
LinkedIn
Follow our RSS feed
RSS Feed

Sponsors

  ASTQB
  HP Software
  Microsoft
  Neustar
  SQE Training
  SmartBear Software
  Tricentis


Our Bloggers

Johanna Rothman is a management consultant and a regular StickyMinds.com and Better Software magazine columnist.

Steve Berczuk is an engineer and ScrumMaster at Humedica where he's helping to build next-generation SaaS-based clinical informatics applications.

Naomi Karten is a highly experienced speaker and seminar leader who draws from her psychology and IT backgrounds to help organizations improve customer satisfaction, manage change, and strengthen teamwork.

Lee Copeland has more than thirty years of experience in the field of software development and testing.

Lisa Crispin has worked as a tester on agile teams for the past ten years, and enjoys sharing her experiences via writing, presenting, teaching and participating in agile testing communities around the world.

Claire Moss has been testing software for 8 years. Although authoring a testing blog and articles are new for her, Claire has always had a passion for writing, which might be a strange trait for a Discrete mathematician.

Site Contents
Back To Top
  • » My Page
  • » Communities
    • - Agile
    • - Manage
    • - Test
  • » Solution Central
    • - HP Solution Center
  • » Interact
    • - Blogs
    • - Forums
  • » Resources
    • - Articles
    • - Better Software Magazine
    • - Download Center
    • - News Center
    • - Podcasts
    • - Videos
  • » Events
    • - Web Seminars
    • - Conferences
    • - Training



Techwell

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • Site Feedback
  • Subscription Services